Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce RTX 2060
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 605.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-605.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+605.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $120 for the GeForce RTX 2060, it costs 88% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 13.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce RTX 2060
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 605.7%. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 10 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 14,114+606% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Turing |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 1920+2900% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1680 MHz+53% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 172.1% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 72.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-93% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+89% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 87.5% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 13.4% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-88% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+13% | 117.6 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | TU106 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #672 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce RTX 2060
