
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce RTX 3060

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 749.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-749.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+749.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $289 for the GeForce RTX 3060, it costs 95% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 126.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+126.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce RTX 3060

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 749.8%. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 16,995+750% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 3584+5500% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1777 MHz+62% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 173.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-93% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+67% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 94.8% less ($274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 126.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-95% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+127% | 58.8 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GA106 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #672 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















