Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 765M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank 326 and the GeForce GTX 765M is on rank 109, so the GeForce GTX 765M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 765M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 863 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,026 | 2,014 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576 | 768+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.21 TFLOPS | 1.326 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+22% | 863 MHz |
| ROPs | 9 | 16+78% |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 135.1+402% | 26.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GK106 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #678 | #680 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce GTX 765M
