Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon TM R9 A360 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon TM R9 A360 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,060 vs 2,026), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon TM R9 A360 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics P580 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon TM R9 A360 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score
2,026
2,060+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
576+13%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.21 TFLOPS+28%
0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+14%
925 MHz
ROPs
9
16+78%
TMUs
72+125%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 carries 2 GB. Radeon TM R9 A360 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580 and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP
15W-50%
30W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
135.1+97%
68.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 came in at $150, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon TM R9 A360 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
13.5
Infinity
Codename
Skylake GT4e
Tropo
Release
September 1 2015
May 5 2015
Ranking
#678
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.