
Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:

Radeon TM R9 A360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank #326 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon TM R9 A360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $60), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 205% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+205%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon TM R9 A360

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,026 | 2,060+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+13% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.21 TFLOPS+28% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+14% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 9 | 16+78% |
| TMUs | 72+125% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 has 2 GB. The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 135.1+97% | 68.7 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 66.7% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 103.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 204.7% better value.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $20-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 103.0+205% |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | Tropo |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #678 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















