
GeForce GTX 765M

Iris Pro Graphics P580
GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 765M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 765M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,014 | 2,026 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 768+33% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.326 TFLOPS+10% | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 1050 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 16+78% | 9 |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 765M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 765M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.9 | 135.1+402% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P580 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GK106 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | May 30 2013 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #680 | #678 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















