GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 765M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 863 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 765M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 765M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,026 vs 2,014), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 765M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics P580 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 765M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 765MIris Pro Graphics P580
G3D Mark Score
2,014
2,026
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
768+33%
576
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.326 TFLOPS+10%
1.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1050 MHz+22%
ROPs
16+78%
9
TMUs
64
72+13%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 765M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 765MIris Pro Graphics P580
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 765M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

FeatureGeForce GTX 765MIris Pro Graphics P580
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 765MIris Pro Graphics P580
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
26.9
135.1+402%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P580 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 765MIris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK106
Skylake GT4e
Release
May 30 2013
September 1 2015
Ranking
#680
#678

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.