GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
GeForce GTX 765M
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 765M is positioned at rank 109 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is on rank 326, so the GeForce GTX 765M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 765M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics P580
GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,014 | 2,026 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 768+33% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.326 TFLOPS+10% | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 1050 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 16+78% | 9 |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 765M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.9 | 135.1+402% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | GK106 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | May 30 2013 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #680 | #678 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics P580
