GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro P520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 765M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 765M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P520 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P520 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,034 vs 2,014), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Quadro P520
G3D Mark Score	2,014	2,034
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.326 TFLOPS+16%	1.147 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	863 MHz	1493 MHz+73%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	64 KB	144 KB+125%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 765M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P520 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Quadro P520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 carries 4 GB. Quadro P520 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M and 64-bit on the Quadro P520. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 512 KB (Quadro P520) — the Quadro P520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Quadro P520
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 122.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Quadro P520
TDP	75W	18W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.9	113.0+320%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P520 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Quadro P520
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GK106	GP108
Release	May 30 2013	May 23 2019
Ranking	#680	#677

Search GeForce GTX 765M on Amazon

Search Quadro P520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.