GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon TM R9 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 765M

2013

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 765M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 765M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon TM R9 A360 instead at 2,060 vs 2,014, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 765M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon TM R9 A360 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon TM R9 A360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 765M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score	2,014	2,060+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.326 TFLOPS+40%	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	863 MHz	925 MHz+7%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	64 KB	128 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 765M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon TM R9 A360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	VCE 2.0
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.9	68.7+155%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon TM R9 A360 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK106	Tropo
Release	May 30 2013	May 5 2015
Ranking	#680	#711

Search GeForce GTX 765M on Amazon

Search Radeon TM R9 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.