GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GeForce GTX 765M
Popular choices:
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 765M is positioned at rank #109 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 765M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 765M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 765M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) uses RDNA 2, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,014 | 2,000 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+500% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 2200 MHz+155% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 765M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)'s 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.9 | 133.3+396% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Raphael |
| Release | May 30 2013 | September 26 2022 |
| Ranking | #680 | #729 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
