Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro P520
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
Quadro P520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank 326 and the Quadro P520 is on rank 111, so the Quadro P520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P520 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro P520
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,026 | 2,034 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+50% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.21 TFLOPS+5% | 1.147 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1493 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 9 | 16+78% |
| TMUs | 72+200% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 has 4 GB. The Quadro P520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 18.2% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-17% | 18W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 135.1+20% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro P520 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 13.6 (Quadro P520) — the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 148.5% better value. The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-60% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8+149% | 13.6 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GP108 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #678 | #677 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro P520
