Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GRID M6-1Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
GRID M6-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank 326 and the GRID M6-1Q is on rank 326, so the GRID M6-1Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $100), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 63.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GRID M6-1Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the GRID M6-1Q reaches 2,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GRID M6-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,026 | 2,069+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576 | 2048+256% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.21 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+299% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1178 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 9 | 64+611% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB. The GRID M6-1Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the GRID M6-1Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 350W (GRID M6-1Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 135.1+1368% | 9.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GRID M6-1Q launched at $1500 and now averages $100. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 40% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 20.7 (GRID M6-1Q) — the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 63.3% better value.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-90% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-40% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8+63% | 20.7 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GM204 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #678 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GRID M6-1Q
