
L2
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌643.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+203.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2155% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
L2
2023Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+203.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2155% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌643.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L2 and Radeon RX 7600

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L2 scores 5,467 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 203.3%. The L2 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 11,776 (L2) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 59.35 TFLOPS (L2) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 92 RT cores (L2) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 368 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,467 | 16,581+203% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 11776+475% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 59.35 TFLOPS+173% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2655 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 368+188% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 11.5 MB+2200% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 92+188% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L2) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (L2) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L2 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (L2) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 165W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.9 | 100.5+405% |
Value Analysis
The L2 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 86.6% less ($1731 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L2) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 2181.5% better value.
| Feature | L2 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $269-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 61.6+2181% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 16 2023 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #189 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













