
GRID M60-8A
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID M60-8A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 275W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 225W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
GRID M60-8A
2015L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 275W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 225W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID M60-8A better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L2 make more sense than GRID M60-8A?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-8A and L2

GRID M60-8A
GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-8A scores 5,523 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8A is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8A) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,523+1% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 11776+475% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+1130% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2520 MHz+114% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 368+188% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 11.5 MB+1433% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-8A) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-8A draws 225W versus the L2's 275W — a 20% difference. The GRID M60-8A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8A) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-18% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5+23% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-8A launched at $2500 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The L2 costs 20% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) vs 2.7 (L2) — the L2 offers 22.7% better value. The L2 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $2000-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 2.7+23% |
| Codename | GM204 | AD102 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #505 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












