M1 8-Core GPU vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the M1 8-Core GPU.

Insight	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-57.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+57.4%)
Longevity	Legacy (5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

M1 8-Core GPU Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 1650

M1 8-Core GPU

The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the M1 8-Core GPU scores 5,000 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. Shader units: 8 (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,000	7,869+57%
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	8	896+11100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The M1 8-Core GPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 88.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: Unified vs 128-bit.

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	68 GB/s	128 GB/s+88%
Bus Width	Unified	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: N/A (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 4.1 (Rosetta 2) vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	N/A	12
OpenGL	4.1 (Rosetta 2)	4.6+12%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Apple M1 Video Decoder vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	Apple M1 Video Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Apple M1 Video Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The M1 8-Core GPU draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	M1 8-Core GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	166.7+59%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).