Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Atom D425
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Atom D425
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is positioned at rank 874 and the Atom D425 is on rank 1088, so the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Performance Per Dollar Atom D425
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Atom D425 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Atom D425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Atom D425
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom D425
The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D425's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Atom D425. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Atom D425 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Atom D425's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Atom D425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.83 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | — | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 405+5% | 385 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D425 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus DDR3-800 on the Atom D425 — the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ supports 197% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D425 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) and Intel NM10 (Atom D425).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Atom D425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+13233% | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) / not specified (Atom D425). The Atom D425 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Atom D425 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel GMA 3150 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Atom D425
