Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Athlon 64 2600+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is positioned at rank 874 and the Athlon 64 2600+ is on rank 1080, so the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2600+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon 64 2600+
The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Athlon 64 2600+'s 392 — a 3.3% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB |
| Process | — | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 405+3% | 392 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 2600+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) vs 2 (Athlon 64 2600+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 16 GB+838860700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) / not specified (Athlon 64 2600+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2600+
