Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
1 / 1
405
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
1 / 1
420
+3.7%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).

    Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

    2004

    Why buy it

      Trade-offs

      • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

      Quick Answers

      So, is Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ better than Mobile Athlon 64 2700+?
      Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
      Which one is better for gaming?
      If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 12.5% higher max boost clock.
      Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
      For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
      Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
      Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.7% higher PassMark.
      Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
      Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

      Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Technical Specifications

      Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

      AMD

      Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

      The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

      AMD

      Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

      The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

      ⚡

      Processing Power

      Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

      FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
      Cores / Threads
      1 / 1
      1 / 1
      Boost Clock
      1.6 GHz
      1.8 GHz+12%
      L2 Cache
      512K
      512K
      Architecture
      Clawhammer (2001−2005)
      Oakville (2003−2004)
      PassMark
      405
      420+4%
      🧠

      Memory & Platform

      Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to 400 memory speed. Both support up to 2 of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+).

      FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
      Socket
      754
      754
      PCIe Generation
      PCIe 1.1
      PCIe 1.1
      Max RAM Speed
      400
      400
      Max RAM Capacity
      2
      2
      RAM Channels
      1
      1
      ECC Support
      No
      No
      PCIe Lanes
      0
      0
      🔧

      Advanced Features

      Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support false virtualization. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715; Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

      FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
      Integrated GPU
      No
      No
      IGPU Model
      None
      None
      Unlocked
      No
      No
      AVX-512
      No
      No
      Virtualization
      false
      false