Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is positioned at rank 874 and the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1157, so the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

#862

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1449%

#863

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1428%

#864

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1311%

#865

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1305%

#866

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1293%

#868

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1248%

#869

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1197%

#870

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1195%

#871

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1163%

#874

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#877

Microsoft SQ1

MSRP: $300|Avg: $180

99%

#879

Core i5-6440HQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

99%

#883

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#884

Athlon II N330

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#889

Core i7-7820EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

#1144

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4121%

#1145

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4060%

#1146

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3728%

#1147

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3711%

#1148

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3677%

#1150

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3551%

#1151

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3404%

#1152

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3399%

#1153

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3308%

#1156

Core i3-330E

MSRP: $177|Avg: $89

100%

#1157

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1158

Core i7-2640M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

99%

#1159

Core M-5Y71

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

99%

#1161

Core i7-2620M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

98%

#1163

Celeron N3010

MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A

96%

#1164

Core i7-3537U

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

95%

#1165

Core M-5Y10c

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1166

Core M-5Y31

MSRP: $281|Avg: $30

95%

#1167

Core M-5Y10a

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1169

Celeron 1047UE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

95%

#1170

Core M-5Y70

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1171

Celeron U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ in both compute-intensive tasks (3.6% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node)	🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Benchmark Check

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
L2 Cache	512K	512K
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark	405	420+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to 400 memory speed. Both support up to 2 of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+).

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+	Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Socket	754	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	400	400
Max RAM Capacity	2	2
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support false virtualization. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715; Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.