Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

+3.2%

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

1 / 1

405

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 84W instead of 512W, a 428W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 418).
❌509.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 84W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron D 352 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2700+?

Yes. Celeron D 352 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron D 352 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron D 352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron D 352 is the better buy right now. Celeron D 352 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $69 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron D 352 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron D 352 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 versus 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron D 352 uses the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Celeron D 352 scores 418 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+'s 405 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron D 352.

Feature	Celeron D 352	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+100%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K
Process	65 nm	—
Architecture	Cedar Mill (2006)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark	418+3%	405
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron D 352 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron D 352 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ — the Celeron D 352 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron D 352 supports up to 4 of RAM compared to 2 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron D 352) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+).

Feature	Celeron D 352	Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Socket	LGA775	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	800+100%	400
Max RAM Capacity	4+100%	2
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support false virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.