Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Sempron LE-1250

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1250

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Sempron LE-1250 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Sempron LE-1250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Sempron LE-1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (405 vs 420).
    • 1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

    Sempron LE-1250

    2007

    Why buy it

    • Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron LE-1250 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2700+?
    Yes. Sempron LE-1250 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron LE-1250 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron LE-1250 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron LE-1250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron LE-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Sempron LE-1250 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron LE-1250

    The Sempron LE-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $29.

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Sempron LE-1250 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Sempron LE-1250 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1250. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Sempron LE-1250 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Sempron LE-1250's 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Sempron LE-1250.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Sempron LE-1250
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.2 GHz+38%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K
    512 kB
    Process
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Clawhammer (2001−2005)
    Sparta (2007)
    PassMark
    405
    420+4%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1250 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Sempron LE-1250
    Socket
    754
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) / not specified (Sempron LE-1250). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Sempron LE-1250
    Integrated GPU
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    false