Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Pentium 4 2.80

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.80

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.79 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
1 / 1
405
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Pentium 4 2.80
1 / 1
408
+0.7%
brand logoPentium III 1400S
brand logoAtom N270
brand logoPentium M 1.30
brand logoCore Solo T1200
brand logoCore i9-10900F
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 408).
    • ❌365.5% higher power demand at 512W vs 110W.

    Pentium 4 2.80

    2002

    Why buy it

    • ✅Draws 110W instead of 512W, a 402W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $327 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium 4 2.80 better than Mobile Athlon 64 2700+?
    Yes. Pentium 4 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 2.80 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 74.4% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium 4 2.80 is the better buy right now. Pentium 4 2.80 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $327 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.80

    The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Pentium 4 2.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 54.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ scores 405 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium 4 2.80.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Pentium 4 2.80
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.79 GHz+74%
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K
    512 kB
    Process
    —
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Clawhammer (2001−2005)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    405
    408
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Pentium 4 2.80
    Socket
    754
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2700+) / not specified (Pentium 4 2.80). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ rivals Pentium M 715.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2700+Pentium 4 2.80
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —