CPU
GPU
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank 1157 and the Athlon XP 3000+ is on rank 1138, so the Athlon XP 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon XP 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon XP 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Athlon XP 3000+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Athlon XP 3000+'s 408 — a 2.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.17 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB |
| Process | — | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| PassMark | 420+3% | 408 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon XP 3000+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 3000+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ supports 2188.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3000+).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Athlon XP 3000+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Athlon XP 3000+
