Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
VS
Pentium M 730

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Pentium M 730

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Pentium M 730

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank 1157 and the Pentium M 730 is on rank 161, so the Pentium M 730 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

#1144
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4121%
#1145
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4060%
#1146
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3728%
#1147
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3711%
#1148
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3677%
#1150
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3551%
#1151
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3404%
#1152
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3399%
#1153
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3308%
#1156
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
100%
#1157
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1158
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1161
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
95%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 730

#147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
337%
#148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
332%
#149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
305%
#150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
304%
#151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
301%
#153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
291%
#154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
279%
#155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
278%
#156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
271%
#161
Pentium M 730
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#174
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 730 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 730
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 730
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M 730

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium M 730

The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M 730 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Pentium M 730 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Pentium M 730's 435 — a 3.5% lead for the Pentium M 730.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 730
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
2 MB+300%
Process
90 nm
Architecture
Oakville (2003−2004)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
420
435+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 730 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 730
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) / not specified (Pentium M 730). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 2800+Pentium M 730
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false