Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 130

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 130

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 130 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
1 / 1
505
+3.5%
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoAthlon 64 2600+
brand logoAthlon XP 3200+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Sempron 130
1 / 1
488
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon MP 2800+
brand logoAthlon XP 3100+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
1080P
Sempron 130
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

2003

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 130

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (488 vs 505).
    • ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ better than Sempron 130?
    Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 130 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 130

    The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Sempron 130 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Sempron 130 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Sempron 130. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Sempron 130 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 3.4% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Sempron 130
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.6 GHz+30%
    Base Clock
    —
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB+100%
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    —
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Newark (2003)
    Sargas (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    505+3%
    488
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Sempron 130
    Socket
    754
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Sempron 130). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Sempron 130
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —