Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 3600+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Sempron 3600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1079 and the Sempron 3600+ is on rank 1075, so the Sempron 3600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Sempron 3600+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3600+
The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Sempron 3600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 4% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K |
| Process | — | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Newark (2003) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 505+4% | 485 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR2-800 on the Sempron 3600+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Sempron 3600+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Sempron 3600+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | None |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Sempron 3600+
