Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Turion 64 ML-34
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Turion 64 ML-34
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1079 and the Turion 64 ML-34 is on rank 938, so the Turion 64 ML-34 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-34
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Turion 64 ML-34
The Turion 64 ML-34 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-34 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Turion 64 ML-34 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Turion 64 ML-34's 515 — a 2% lead for the Turion 64 ML-34.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | — | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Newark (2003) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 505 | 515+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR-400 on the Turion 64 ML-34 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ supports 100+% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs 16 (Turion 64 ML-34) — the Turion 64 ML-34 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 2 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs AMD-V (Turion 64 ML-34). Primary use case: Turion 64 ML-34 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Turion 64 ML-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Turion 64 ML-34
