Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
VS
Pentium M 750

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 750

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
VS
Intel

Pentium M 750

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1079 and the Pentium M 750 is on rank 131, so the Pentium M 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

#1067
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2905%
#1068
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2862%
#1069
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2628%
#1070
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2616%
#1071
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2592%
#1073
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2503%
#1074
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2400%
#1075
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2396%
#1076
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2332%
#1079
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
100%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
98%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
95%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
94%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 750

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
95%
#119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
302%
#120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
298%
#121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
274%
#122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
272%
#123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
270%
#125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
261%
#126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
250%
#127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
249%
#128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
243%
#131
Pentium M 750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 750 in both compute-intensive tasks (4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightMobile Athlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightMobile Athlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Pentium M 750

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Pentium M 750 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Pentium M 750 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 4% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz+8%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
90 nm
Architecture
Newark (2003)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
505+4%
485
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Pentium M 750). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.

FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3200+Pentium M 750
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false