Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 760

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 760 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

1 / 1

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

+2.0%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 515).

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3200+?

Yes. Pentium M 760 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Pentium M 760 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3200+	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Newark (2003)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	505	515+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Pentium M 760 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs 2 (Pentium M 760). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3200+	Pentium M 760
Socket	754	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	400	DDR2-533+33%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Pentium M 760). Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735; Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.