Mobility Radeon 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Mobility Radeon 4100

2009Core: 550 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Mobility Radeon 4100

0.0%

Mobility Radeon X1400

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MOBILITY RADEON X700

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

7,869

+9614.8%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is positioned at rank #666 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon 4100

#655

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

6580%

#657

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

5965%

#658

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5949%

#662

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

5410%

#663

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

5373%

#665

Radeon HD 2900 XT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

100%

#666

Mobility Radeon 4100

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#667

GeForce 9700M GT

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

99%

#668

GeForce 9300 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#669

Mobility Radeon X2500

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#670

Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $57

92%

#671

GeForce 9800M GTX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $30

92%

#672

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

90%

#673

GeForce 505

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

88%

#674

GeForce 9200M GE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

87%

#675

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

87%

#676

Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $40

86%

#677

GeForce 7500 LE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

86%

#678

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

83%

#679

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

82%

#680

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

82%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9614.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon 4100.

Insight	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-9614.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+9614.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6247% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon 4100.

Insight	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+6247%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Mobility Radeon 4100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon 4100 and GeForce GTX 1650

Mobility Radeon 4100

The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon 4100 scores 81 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 9614.8%. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	81	7,869+9615%
Architecture	TeraScale	Turing
Process Node	55 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	800	896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+239%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	160 KB	896 KB+460%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon 4100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10.1	12+19%
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 2	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon 4100 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70°C.

Feature	Mobility Radeon 4100	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	2.7	104.9+3785%

💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon 4100 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Mobility Radeon 4100 costs 34.7% less ($26 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6070.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).