CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is positioned at rank 732 and the GeForce FX 5200 is on rank 374, so the GeForce FX 5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5200 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The GeForce FX 5200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $25 for the GeForce FX 5200, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 275% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+275%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP and GeForce FX 5200
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5200's 8 — the GeForce FX 5200 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce FX 5200 uses Rankine, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 21760+2620% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+9257% |
| ROPs | 16 | 176+1000% |
| TMUs | 40 | 680+1600% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 21.3 MB+26525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 96 MB+38300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 96 MB+38300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 9.0a+29% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5200's 575W — a 168% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-91% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 152mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP launched at $20 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce FX 5200 launched at $70 and now averages $25. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP costs 80% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 300% better value. The GeForce FX 5200 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $20-71% | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-80% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+300% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Broadway | GB202 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #846 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP and GeForce FX 5200
