MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP vs GeForce4 Ti 4400
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is positioned at rank 732 and the GeForce4 Ti 4400 is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce4 Ti 4400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $49 for the GeForce4 Ti 4400, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 740% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+740%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP and GeForce4 Ti 4400
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 16.7%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 7+17% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 16384+1948% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+7273% |
| ROPs | 16 | 176+1000% |
| TMUs | 40 | 512+1180% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 16 MB+19900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 72 MB+28700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 72 MB+28700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP draws 50W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 160% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-89% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 216mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP launched at $20 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 1100% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $20-93% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-90% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+1100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | AD102 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #846 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP and GeForce4 Ti 4400
