GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 316642.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 Ti 4400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+316642.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-316642.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 77502% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 Ti 4400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77502%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 316642.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) with 184 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+316643% | 7 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 16384+178% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+307% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2520 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 512+178% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 16 MB+176% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 128+178% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 512+178% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+48% | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+254% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 68.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-51% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 216mm |
| Height | 112mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 and now averages $49. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 costs 75.5% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 110800% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $299-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $49-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+110800% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce4 Ti 4400
