MOBILITY RADEON 7500
VS
GeForce2 MX 100/200

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank #744 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500

#734
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
135713%
#736
123025%
#737
122700%
#741
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
111575%
#742
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
110813%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
75%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
75%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
63%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
50%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
50%
#750
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
38%
#751
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
38%
#752
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
38%
#753
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
38%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
25%
#755
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
13%
#756
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce2 MX 100/200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
Performance
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 335.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+335.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and GeForce2 MX 100/200

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+40%
0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
144 KB+80%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has 512 MB. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 512 KB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
DirectX
7.0
7.0
OpenGL
1.3+8%
1.2
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 55.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
TDP
50W
10W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Height
64mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
55-21%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.3+200%
💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.1 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce2 MX 100/200
MSRP
$49
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-69%
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.3+200%
0.1
Codename
Broadway
GP108
Release
January 7 2010
May 17 2017
Ranking
#846
#657