MOBILITY RADEON 7500
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank #744 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500

#734
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
135713%
#736
123025%
#737
122700%
#741
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
111575%
#742
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
110813%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
75%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
75%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
63%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
50%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
50%
#750
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
38%
#751
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
38%
#752
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
38%
#753
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
38%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
25%
#755
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
13%
#756
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 196625% higher G3D Mark score and 6249.2% more VRAM (4 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 7500.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-196625%)
Leading raw performance (+196625%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+6249.2%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 39245% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON 7500.

InsightMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+39245%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 196625%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
4
7,869+196625%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
800
896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6249.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
4 GB+6249%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
7.0
12+71%
OpenGL
1.3
4.6+254%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
104.9+104800%
💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 34866.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$49-67%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$15-80%
$75
Performance per Dollar
0.3
104.9+34867%
Codename
Broadway
TU117
Release
January 7 2010
April 23 2019
Ranking
#846
#323