MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs GeForce Go 6400
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is positioned at rank 720 and the GeForce Go 6400 is on rank 338, so the GeForce Go 6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score and 681.3% more VRAM (128 MB vs 16 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6400.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+681.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and GeForce Go 6400
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 scores 27 versus the GeForce Go 6400's 24 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 leads by 12.5%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce Go 6400 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27+13% | 24 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+62% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+150% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 offers 681.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB+681% | 0.016 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 6400's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-23% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 6400 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | GK107 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #846 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and GeForce Go 6400
