MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON A9800XT

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON A9800XT

2015Boost: 970 MHz
Similar parts
····

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON A9800XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON A9800XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010

Why buy it

  • +17.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 220mm, a 219mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON A9800XT

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (23 vs 27).
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
  • 21900% longer card at 220mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 17.4% in PassMark G3D (27 vs 23), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON A9800XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

AMD

RADEON A9800XT

The RADEON A9800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 scores 27 versus the RADEON A9800XT's 23 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 leads by 17.4%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON A9800XT uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 2,048 (RADEON A9800XT). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (RADEON A9800XT).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
G3D Mark Score
27+17%
23
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
2048+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
3.973 TFLOPS+255%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
80 KB
512 KB+540%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON A9800XT carries 512 MB. RADEON A9800XT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and 64-bit on the RADEON A9800XT. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 512 KB (RADEON A9800XT) — the RADEON A9800XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 9_0 (RADEON A9800XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
DirectX
9.0
9_0
Max Displays
0
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 draws 50W versus the RADEON A9800XT's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 350W (RADEON A9800XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 220mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
TDP
50W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
1mm
220mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
0.5+400%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 came in at $49, while the RADEON A9800XT launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON A9800XT was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs Infinity (RADEON A9800XT) — the RADEON A9800XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON A9800XT (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9700RADEON A9800XT
MSRP
$49
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
Infinity
Codename
Broadway
Antigua
Release
January 7 2010
November 19 2015
Ranking
#846
#394

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.