
MOBILITY RADEON 9700

Radeon 9550 / X1050
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 165mm, a 164mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 9550 / X1050
2019Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌16400% longer card at 165mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

Radeon 9550 / X1050
The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 scores 27 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 leads by 7.4%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27 | 29+7% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 carries 512 MB. Radeon 9550 / X1050 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and 64-bit on the Radeon 9550 / X1050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 draws 50W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 165mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 came in at $49, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 9550 / X1050 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs Infinity (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 9550 / X1050 (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9700 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadway | Lexa |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #772 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














