MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (27 vs 34).
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON X300

2010

Why buy it

✅+25.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 23.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY RADEON X300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25.9% in PassMark G3D (34 vs 27), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON X300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.4% (0.7 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MOBILITY RADEON 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

MOBILITY RADEON X300

The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 scores 27 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X300's 34 — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 leads by 25.9%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
G3D Mark Score	27	34+26%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X300.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
DirectX	9.0	9.0b
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X300's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.5	0.7+40%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 came in at $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9700 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers 16.7% better value.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	MOBILITY RADEON X300
MSRP	$49-2%	$50
Performance per Dollar	0.6	0.7+17%
Codename	Broadway	Broadway
Release	January 7 2010	January 7 2010
Ranking	#846	#846

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9700 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON X300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.