MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010

Why buy it

✅+17.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON XPRESS 200M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (23 vs 27).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 17.4% in PassMark G3D (27 vs 23), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON XPRESS 200M has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 scores 27 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 leads by 17.4%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	27+17%	23
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	2560+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+371%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	160+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. RADEON XPRESS 200M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	9.0	9_0
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 draws 50W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	0.5	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON XPRESS 200M (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9700	RADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP	$49	—
Codename	Broadway	Navi 12
Release	January 7 2010	June 15 2020
Ranking	#846	#283

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9700 on Amazon

Search RADEON XPRESS 200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.