G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs RADEON HD 6350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs RADEON HD 6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 186W, a 136W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
63.3% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON HD 6350

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌272% higher power demand at 186W vs 50W.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD 6350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (141 vs 140), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD 6350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.5% (4.7 vs 2.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD 6350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 3650 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs RADEON HD 6350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

RADEON HD 6350

The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 scores 140 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
G3D Mark Score	140	141
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	1280+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	80 KB	320 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD 6350 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 3650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD 6350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
DirectX	10.1	11.2 (11_0)+11%
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs None (RADEON HD 6350). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
Encoder	UVD	None
Decoder	UVD	UVD 2.2
Codecs	—	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 draws 50W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
TDP	50W-73%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	2.8+250%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 came in at $49, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON HD 6350 was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 offers 62.1% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD 6350 (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3650	RADEON HD 6350
MSRP	$49	$30-39%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	4.7+62%
Codename	Broadway	Cayman
Release	January 7 2010	December 1 2011
Ranking	#846	#598

Search Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD 6350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.