GeForce 9200M GE
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9200M GE
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 50W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144+3% | 140 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+120% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 3650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3650. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3650's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-68% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+221% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9200M GE came in at $100, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3650 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 2.9+107% |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #864 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GE and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
