Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 8180

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8180

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 8180 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 63.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8180

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • Delivers 57.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (140 vs 135), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8180 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 57.5% (4.5 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8180 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 3650 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 8180 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8180

The Radeon HD 8180 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 scores 140 and the Radeon HD 8180 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8180 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8180). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8180).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 8180
G3D Mark Score
140+4%
135
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+25%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+13%
0.992 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
160 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 8180
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8180 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 3650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8180.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 8180
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8180's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 8180 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8180). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 8180
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
2.8+4%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 8180 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8180 was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) vs 4.5 (Radeon HD 8180) — the Radeon HD 8180 offers 55.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8180 (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 8180
MSRP
$49
$30-39%
Performance per Dollar
2.9
4.5+55%
Codename
Broadway
Venus
Release
January 7 2010
April 1 2013
Ranking
#846
#745

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.