
Mobility Radeon X1450 vs GeForce 6100

Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:

GeForce 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is positioned at rank #730 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce 6100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 22.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+22.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-22.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon X1450 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce 6100

Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

GeForce 6100
The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 versus the GeForce 6100's 27 — the Mobility Radeon X1450 leads by 22.2%. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 6100 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 384 (GeForce 6100). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33+22% | 27 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 144 KB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1450 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6100 has 512 MB. The GeForce 6100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6100). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs No (GeForce 6100). Decoder: AVIVO vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6100).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | No |
| Decoder | AVIVO | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the GeForce 6100's 30W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (GeForce 6100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6100 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs Infinity (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 6100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadway | GP108 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #846 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















