Mobility Radeon X1450 vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is positioned at rank #730 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 and the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 34+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+322% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 2 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1450 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Decoder: AVIVO vs Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | Integrated Decoder ONLY |
| Decoder | AVIVO | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 25W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 1.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadway | GA107 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #846 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
