Mobility Radeon X1450 vs GeForce FX 5900
Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is positioned at rank 730 and the GeForce FX 5900 is on rank 377, so the GeForce FX 5900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 88.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+88.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce FX 5900
Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
GeForce FX 5900
The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 versus the GeForce FX 5900's 35 — the GeForce FX 5900 leads by 6.1%. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce FX 5900 uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 35+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1024 ×2+28% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 1 MB+1150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900) — the GeForce FX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5900's 365W — a 151.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-86% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 218mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce FX 5900 launched at $399 and now averages $20. The Mobility Radeon X1450 costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 1.8 (GeForce FX 5900) — the Mobility Radeon X1450 offers 83.3% better value. The GeForce FX 5900 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3+83% | 1.8 |
| Codename | Broadway | GF110 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #846 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce FX 5900
