Mobility Radeon X1450 vs GeForce PCX 5750
Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is positioned at rank 730 and the GeForce PCX 5750 is on rank 366, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 41.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce PCX 5750
Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1450 scores 33 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the GeForce PCX 5750 leads by 6.1%. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 35+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+67% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 60+50% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 960 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: AVIVO vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | None |
| Decoder | AVIVO | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1450 draws 50W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+250% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X1450 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the Mobility Radeon X1450 offers 43.5% better value.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1450 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3+43% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Broadway | GF110 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #846 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1450 and GeForce PCX 5750
