
Mobility Radeon X1600

Radeon X1650 Pro
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon X1600
2010Why buy it
- ✅+8.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1650 Pro
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (85 vs 92).
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the Mobility Radeon X1600 leads by 8.2%. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92+8% | 85 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8+500% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1600 came in at $49, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 137.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1600 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9+137% | 0.8 |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #846 | #92 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














