Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023Boost: 2581 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1600

2010

Why buy it

  • +8.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 120.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (85 vs 92).
  • 104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.2% in PassMark G3D (92 vs 85), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.9% (1.9 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon X1600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1650 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon X1600 vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1600

The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1600 scores 92 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the Mobility Radeon X1600 leads by 8.2%. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).

FeatureMobility Radeon X1600Radeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score
92+8%
85
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
2560+220%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon X1600Radeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

FeatureMobility Radeon X1600Radeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1600 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon X1600Radeon X1650 Pro
TDP
50W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
1.8+500%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1600 came in at $49, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 137.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon X1600Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP
$49-51%
$100
Performance per Dollar
1.9+137%
0.8
Codename
Broadway
Navi 22
Release
January 7 2010
October 17 2023
Ranking
#846
#92

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.