
N100

Xeon E3-1225 v3
N100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
N100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
N100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
N100
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 84W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1225 v3, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1225 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1225 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while N100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,324 vs 5,355).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ❌1300% higher power demand at 84W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1150 with DDR4, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is N100 better than Xeon E3-1225 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

N100
The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1225 v3
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
Both the N100 and Xeon E3-1225 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the N100 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 v3. The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is built on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the N100 scores 5,355 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 — a 0.6% lead for the N100. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | — | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 5,355 | 5,324 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,108 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,324 |
Memory & Platform
The N100 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (N100) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1225 v3). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the N100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the N100 was priced at $128, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($128 vs $224), N100 was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the N100 delivers 41.8 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — making the N100 the 55.1% better value option.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-43% | $224 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.8+76% | 23.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













