N100 vs Xeon X5687

Intel

N100

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5687

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

N100 vs Xeon X5687 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

N100 vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

N100 vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

N100

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $424 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
  • Delivers 328.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
  • Draws 6W instead of 130W, a 124W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5687 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,355 vs 5,386).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
  • 2066.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 6W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1366, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5687 better than N100?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while N100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5687 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5687 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon X5687 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X5687 comes in 331.3% more expensive on MSRP at $552 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. N100 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 19.3% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1366. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

N100 vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

N100

The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

Processing Power

The N100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5687's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the N100 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687. The Xeon X5687 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the N100 scores 5,355 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon X5687. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

FeatureN100Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.86 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
5,355
5,386
Geekbench 6 Single
1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,386
🧠

Memory & Platform

The N100 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureN100Xeon X5687
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
36
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (N100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5687). Primary use case: Xeon X5687 targets Server.

FeatureN100Xeon X5687
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the N100 was priced at $128, while the Xeon X5687 came in at $552. On launch pricing ($128 vs $552), N100 was $424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the N100 delivers 41.8 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5687 — making the N100 the 124.4% better value option.

FeatureN100Xeon X5687
MSRP
$128-77%
$552
Performance per Dollar
41.8+327%
9.8
Release Date
2023
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.