
N100

Xeon X5687
N100 vs Xeon X5687 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
N100 vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
N100 vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
N100
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $424 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 328.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 130W, a 124W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5687 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,355 vs 5,386).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.
Xeon X5687
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1366, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon X5687 better than N100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N100 vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

N100
The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5687
The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.
Processing Power
The N100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5687's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the N100 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687. The Xeon X5687 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the N100 scores 5,355 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon X5687. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon X5687 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.86 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,355 | 5,386 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,643 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,386 |
Memory & Platform
The N100 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon X5687 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 288 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 36 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (N100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5687). Primary use case: Xeon X5687 targets Server.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon X5687 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the N100 was priced at $128, while the Xeon X5687 came in at $552. On launch pricing ($128 vs $552), N100 was $424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the N100 delivers 41.8 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5687 — making the N100 the 124.4% better value option.
| Feature | N100 | Xeon X5687 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-77% | $552 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.8+327% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













