Opteron 248 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 248 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 248 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 248

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (585 vs 26,609).
❌36.9% higher power demand at 89W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1749.6% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 89W, a 24W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Opteron 248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Opteron 248?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1749.6% more average FPS across 32 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 4448.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1749.6% average FPS lead across 32 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 248 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 248 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 70.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Opteron 248 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 248 scores 585 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 191.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 248 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	Opteron 248	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	8 / 16+700%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	4.6 GHz+109%
Base Clock	—	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	130 nm	7 nm-95%
Architecture	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	585	26,609+4449%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 248 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 248	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	940	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 248) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.