Opteron 6328
VS
Core i5-4670S

Opteron 6328 vs Core i5-4670S

AMD

Opteron 6328

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-4670S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 6328 is positioned at rank 64 and the Core i5-4670S is on rank 693, so the Opteron 6328 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6328

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1567%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
296%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
263%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
203%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
95%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
91%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
91%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
86%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
86%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
86%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
83%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
83%
#64
Opteron 6328
MSRP: $575|Avg: $42
100%
#65
Opteron 6272
MSRP: $523|Avg: $50
99%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
90%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12641%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11944%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8672%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2069%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1810%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1037%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1023%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
932%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
932%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
921%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
896%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
884%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
872%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
100%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
100%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
100%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
100%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
98%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
97%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-4670S leads in gaming performance. However, the Opteron 6328 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Abu Dhabi (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-4670S stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 29% cheaper ($30 vs $42) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+39%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6328 and Core i5-4670S

AMD

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Intel

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-4670S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4670S uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Core i5-4670S's 5,252 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 6328. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S.

FeatureOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+3%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Abu Dhabi (2012)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,306+1%
5,252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4670S uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
Socket
G34
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6328) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6328 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.

FeatureOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop Low Power
💰

Value Analysis

The Opteron 6328 launched at $575 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670S debuted at $213. At current prices ($42 vs $30), the Core i5-4670S is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6328 delivers 126.3 pts/$ vs 175.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670S — making the Core i5-4670S the 32.3% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 6328Core i5-4670S
MSRP
$575
$213-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$42
$30-29%
Performance per Dollar
126.3
175.1+39%
Release Date
2012
2013