Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6328

8 / 8

5,306

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1225 v3

4 / 4

5,324

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,306 vs 5,324).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
❌36.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 84W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1225 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1225 v3

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Delivers 157.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 115W, a 31W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1225 v3 better than Opteron 6328?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6328 is ahead with a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1225 v3 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1225 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1225 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1225 v3 comes in $351 cheaper on MSRP at $224 MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6328 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 157.6% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1225 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon E3-1225 v3

The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1225 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,306	5,324
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,108
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1225 v3
Socket	G34	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6328) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1225 v3). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Opteron 6328 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1225 v3
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6328 was priced at $575, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($575 vs $224), Xeon E3-1225 v3 was $351 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6328 delivers 9.2 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — making the Xeon E3-1225 v3 the 88.1% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1225 v3
MSRP	$575	$224-61%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	23.8+159%
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Opteron 6328 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1225 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.